Efficacy and Temporal Stability of Reduced Safety Margins for Ventricular Defibrillation

Background—Traditionally, a safety margin of at least 10 J between the maximum output of the pulse generator and the energy needed for ventricular defibrillation has been used because lower safety margins were associated with unacceptably high rates of failed defibrillation and sudden cardiac death. The Low Energy Safety Study (LESS) was a prospective, randomized assessment of the safety margin requirements for modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. Methods and Results—A total of 636 patients undergoing initial ICD implantation with a dual-coil lead and active pulse generator were evaluated. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) and enhanced DFT (DFT1 and DFT11) were measured using a modified step-down protocol. Conversion testing of induced ventricular fibrillation before discharge, at 3 months, and at 12 months was performed in all 392 patients, as was randomization to chronic programming at either 2 steps above DFT11 or maximal output in all patients. The induced ventricular fibrillation data had conversion success rates of 91.4%, 97.9%, 99.1%, 99.6%, and 99.8% for safety margins of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 steps above the DFT11, respectively. A margin of 4 to 6 J was adequate to maintain high conversion success over time (98.9% before discharge versus 99.2% at 12 months; P5NS). Over a mean follow-up of 24613 months, conversion of spontaneously occurring ventricular tachyarrhythmias .200 bpm was identical (97.3%), despite a safety margin difference of 5.261.1 J for the 2-step group versus 20.864.2 J for maximal output. Conclusions—With a rigorous implantation algorithm, a safety margin of about 5 J is adequate for safe implantation of modern ICD systems. (Circulation. 2002;105:2043-2048.)